Potential For The Use Of Questionnaire Rights By The Dpr Towards Controversy On Judges' Decisions (Case Study Of Constitutional Court Ruling No. 90/Puu-Xxi/2023)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the potential use of questionnaire rights by the DPR in response to controversies that arise after the Constitutional Court (MK) decision, focusing on the Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This research involves an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of the relationship between the people's representative institution (DPR) and the judicial institution (MK), especially in the context of conflicting views related to controversial legal decisions. This research methodology uses a qualitative approach by extracting data from various sources, including official documents, interviews with DPR members, and analysis of the text of the Constitutional Court ruling. The research will explore the extent to which the DPR questionnaire right can be utilized as an effective instrument in uncovering and responding to dissatisfaction with the Constitutional Court's rulings, as well as their impact on the balance between executive, legislative, and judicial powers. The research findings are expected to provide a deeper understanding of the role of DPR questionnaire rights in responding to the controversy over judges' decisions, taking into account political, legal, and constitutional aspects. The implications of this research are expected to contribute to the development of control mechanisms and the balance of power within the Indonesian political and legal system.